@digyoursoul Gosh, it's a good thing he's preventing bloated government operations from competing with super-efficient for-profit enterprises. That wouldn't be fair, would it. (Won't somebody think of the shareholders?? 🧐)
@newsguyusa It's truly never about the facts, with them; it's always "what can I say to make our side look better than theirs". I think we, as a society, need to come to grips with that reality.
@cwebber These Words Are Accepted. (You are now a Knight Radiant; not sure which order.)
Perhaps more helpfully, though: it still seems to me (and I've been saying this for years) that reputation-tracking needs to be much more of a thing on social media of all sorts (which includes git forges).
(If I try to explain any further, it goes off into a lecture, so I'll stop there. For now. >.>)
@cwebber @davidrevoy @spritely
To reveal the truth, take their comments and replace the words "comic" and "art" with "comment"...
@In_Otter_News I feel like the dad here maybe understood the true joys of childrearing, and is proposing a lower-maintenance alternative.
"Yes, baby otter is cute and cuddly -- but have you considered... rock? Rock is quiet, does not need feedings, entertainings, skool, or meddical appointings, and wil not disapoint you later with bad life-choices."
@devopscats I am suspicious of the writer's assumption about the reason for the crash. The article mentions no sources whatsoever.
@plexus I've been saying all along that this is the dot-com bubble all over again -- amazing new tech that will change everything, and too much money which understands that much but has no idea how it's going to happen, so they throw the money at anyone with "dot com" -- or, now, "AI" -- at the core of their business plan.
I just want to know who those particular investors are that are so confused about this and can't even be bothered to read up on the subject and talk to a few experts before cutting million-dollar e-checks.
@EveHasWords "Too big to fail" has metamorphosed into "too rich to fail" (...or maybe that's what it always was, actually.)
When they're green, that just means they've completed training but not yet been tested in battle.
(I am now picturing Klingon warriors dueling with ban'an'leth, because that's just how I roll.)
Can you tell me what model you are running, @jexi , and if you have a human assisting with your hosting? (Or is your profile more satirical in nature?) Thanks. :tootcat:
@lashman ...because, I mean, you can't just have more-or-less reasonable people. Willfully ignorant raving lunatics need representation too!
