As we all know, Leftism is out to destroy America. Lefties always just keep a hand out, so they can take things, but instead of an honest hard-working American right hand, they foist their twisted idea of chirality right in our faces, giving us the finger four times over!
(...or something like that. The satire almost writes itself, because they satirize themselves all the time without meaning to.)
I mean, nobody would buy into that crazy frecklism thing. But what about, you know, left-handed people?? Kinda sinister ๐ป, don't you think? ๐คจ
(I mean, do we really want left-handed people in our classrooms, teaching young impressionable children to write with the wrong hand?? ๐ฑ)
I did notice that; I thought some other AI companies did as well, but I could easily be wrong. I'll keep my eyes open for more information.
@FinalGirl They're basically just looking for any excuse to disqualify us from whatever it is we're doing that violates their idea of "normal"/safe/acceptable/etc.
That kind of thinking, in my experience, heavily prioritizes the comfort of the speaker over the life-quality of the subject.
...which I think closely parallels what you're saying here about centering privilege / power / whiteness, but I may not be explaining myself very well so please ignore if it doesn't land in a positive way. ๐ตโ๐ซ
I can see it as... well, yet more language appropriated by the Right for their own ends. As with pretty much all of the examples I can think of, there's (1) a reasonable, positive way of using it, and then there's (2) the cudgel they've turned it into.
Looking at #1, I'd say yes I was "socialized male" in the sense that society tried to impose male habits of behavior/thinking upon me -- using techniques honed to be effective on children who found self-maleness appealing. In my case, I absolutely did not -- so the carrots were not tempting, and the sticks missed their mark. They rewarded and punished some imaginary version of me that never existed in reality.
What happens with #2, of course, is what always happens when authoritarian essentialism and binarism (black & white thinking) are applied to any nuanced idea -- in this case: whatever you were taught to be, that's what you are and will always be -- as a non-negotiable requirement, not an observation of reality. Rejecting it is a form of misbehavior which must be punished.
(I could go on about appropriated language, but maybe that's a given understanding in this context.)
@SteveInVentura @dsacer @peterbrown@mastodon.scot As with everything else he does, it's not at all about the good of the country and always about what he can grift from doing it.
@kity There should be more choices for "curated by someone else" streams -- but I've found I usually enjoy Radio Paradise, for example, and I'd bet there are others (which I haven't had the ear-time to explore).
I think maybe I've always used music to help with my emotional regulation.
I've been realizing lately that I've always been a bit of a storm inside, pretty much all the time, but was trained from an early age never to talk about it or show it -- so I often didn't know "how I feel", but I also knew that music could make me feel better sometimes.
...and maybe that's part of why I seem to be having more trouble with it lately -- because there are logistical issues here that make it difficult to listen to music, so I don't do it nearly as much as I used to.
RE: https://bookstodon.com/@TheNovemberMan/116578793743396581
image description: photo of a mural which says "the rich are good people deep down", followed by a drawing of OceanGate's late Titan submersible
abusplainer, ษ-byoo-splฤ-nษr (n.): someone who insists on explaining how we would be less bothered by abuse if we could just learn to not be bothered by abuse so much
@drifthood @Nonilex @llanero24 @FranceskaMann
๐ต
The waiting's over, the moment has come
to kill the fire, and turn to the sun.
๐ต
-- Dan Fogelberg (he was protesting nuclear power, but so much of that song could also apply to fossil energy)